Question 1

What is this property worth?

Accepted Answer

read the right array, and never substitute the assessment search with monid and find

in the rows: there is no address lookup in this aisle, the search takes a location and a page and nothing else. then try the detail call for its zpid, and if it 502s take price, beds and baths from the search row you already have the listing: $524,900 · four bed, two bath · 2,314 sqft on a quarter-acre cul-de-sac lot the history: listed at $549,900 in July, so it has already come down $25,000 the detail call is unreliable: on a second zip it 502'd on all three live properties across ten minutes and three backoffs, and succeeded only on an unrelated property and on the zpid printed in its own documentation and it holds the two fields you needed it for: square footage and the price history are exactly what the search row does not carry, so when it fails those are the two things you cannot get the shape: details take a zpid only, no address and no coordinates, so the search comes first the cheaper one: zillow's detail is $0.01; homes.com's is $0.03 and wants the full listing url

Question 2

Who are the real agents in this market?

Accepted Answer

split the teams from the people before you rank anyone search agents in <market> with zillow on monid and give me the twelve-month sale count for each. teams and individuals are mixed on every page, so separate them by the TEAM tag on each card rather than by the label under the number: the label has four different wordings including a singular one and a no-sales one, and a parser keyed to a single string silently drops rows the pages are mixed, not split: an earlier version of this page said page one is all teams and individuals start on page two. On two other markets page one ran 11 teams to 4 individuals and 13 to 2, and page two ran the other way. The split is per card, and you have to make it yourself on every page and the numbers are team numbers on team cards: a card reading 2,413 sales in twelve months is a team's twelve months; read as one person's production it is wrong by the size of the team the tag is the tell, not the label: every card carries a TEAM tag, which agreed with the label on all seventy-five cards checked. The label is the worse of the two: it has four wordings, going singular at one sale and reading no sales last 12 months with a null value, so a regex on one string drops rows silently and the ranges overlap almost completely: a page-two team outsold thirteen of the fifteen page-one cards, so page position is not a proxy for size either

Homes.com

Try it with your agents

How-to guides

Homes.com

Try it with your agents

How-to guides

Related categories